Sunday, September 14, 2025

Hiromi Kawakami - Under The Eye Of The Big Bird (Granta, 2025) ***


In some far away time in the future, the human race is close to extinction. People are getting cloned, and educated and somehow supervised by AI generated "mothers" and "watchers". The cloning has been going on for thousands of years, and some clones surprisingly keep the memories of their original genetic line. 

Kawakami plays with this far-away vision to create characters living through this period, with either the clones, or the AI-led individuals acting as the narrator of the short stories. These are all somehow connected, something which is gradually revealed as we become more familiar with the names. 

The view of the narrators on the human race is not very generous. 

"As a species, we simply don't have what it takes, "Jakob had said. His voice sounded strained (...) "The decline of humankind can't be stopped, - not by you, not by me, not by anyone on this planet. None of us has the power", he said. "We were supposed to be so much more than this." (p. 83)

"All right. Well, the humans died out. It was always going to be a matter of time, of course, before they went extinct. (...) The humans kept doing the same things: loving one another, hating one another, fighting one another ... You'd think they might have come up with something else to try, but no matter how many times they went around, they couldn't seem to change course." (p. 252)

Kawakami gives a coherent picture of this distant future and all her stories are quite focused, often unexpected in the sense that you can only figure out gradually what the context is, and to which group the narrator belongs. On the other hand, her literary qualities are too narrow to make the characters come to live. The whole focus of the stories is on the science fiction, not on the emotional power or plot tension as you might expect. 

One character - someone living with several identical clones - says 

"I have considered the word you use about me: boring. Is it boring not to have a personality? I spent a few hundred years on this question. The results, however, were inconclusive." (p. 231)

And that's a little bit my own appreciation of this novel. It gives an interesting perspective from a very distant future, but it could have done with more of today's literary basics. 



No comments: