Thursday, January 2, 2025

Books of the Year 2024

 


It's been a great year, with 50 books read, thanks to the shitty weather, especially during the holiday season. The choice is hard, especially in the non-fiction area. 

In the non-fiction space, I loved the two major books by neuroscientists about whether or not we have free will. The challenge came from Robert Sapolsky, the reply by Kevin J. Mitchell.  An equally important and excellent book is Sarah Bakewell overview of the history of humanistic thought. 

In fiction, many of the great writers, such as Murakami, the posthumous Garcia Marquez, or Han Kang, did not meet my high expectations. The winner in my opinion is again Olga Tokarczuk, now stylistically totally different, reminiscent of the Thomas Mann's Magic Mountain, published a century ago. We see again great literature from Mexico and Cuba, Spain and France, the UK and Australia. As a total coincidence, four books describe a strange form of paradisiac themes: Paul Harding's "The Other Eden", Murakami's "The City And Its Uncertain Walls", Jim Crace's "Eden" and Abbott Kahler's "Eden Undone". 

I also felt quite happy to have (re)read Douglas Hofstadter's unparallelled "Gödel, Escher & Bach", and to have read Martin Amis's "Einstein's Monsters", which makes him feature on my list of authors of whom I've read every novel (further featuring Roberto Bolaño, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Mario Vargas Llosa, Milan Kundera, Haruki Murakami, Michael Chabon, Thomas Pynchon and the translated works of Olga Tokarczuk).

It is also remarkable that in my top-5 of novels, four were published by the excellent publishing house Fitzcarraldo. 

Fiction 
  1. Olga Tokarczuk - The Empusium ***** 
  2. Fernanda Melchor - Hurricane Season  ****½ 
  3. Carlos Manuel Álvarez - The Tribe  ****½ 
  4. Paul Harding - This Other Eden  ****½ 
  5. Munir Hachemi - Living Things **** 
  6. Sorj Chalandon - L'Enragé **** 
  7. Jim Crace - Eden  **** 
  8. John Banville - The Singularities **** 
  9. Teju Cole - Tremor  **** 
  10. Tim Winton - Juice  **** 

Non-Fiction 
  1. Kevin J. Mitchell - Free Agents - How Evolution Gave Us Free Will ***** 
  2. Sarah Bakewell - Humanly Possible  ***** 
  3. Irene Vallejo - Papyrus  ****½ 
  4. Michael Taylor - Impossible Monsters ****½ 
  5. Robert Sapolsky - Determined - Life Without Free Will  ****½ 
  6. Anne Applebaum - Autocracy, Inc. **** 
  7. Bart D. Ehrman - Armageddon - What the Bible Really Says About the End **** 
  8. Daniel Kahneman, Olivier Sibony & Cass R. Sunstein - Noise - A Flaw in Human Judgment **** 
  9. Giorgio Parisi - In A Flight Of Starlings **** 
  10. Bart Van Loo - De Bourgondiërs **** 


Michael Taylor - Impossible Monsters: Dinosaurs, Darwin and the War Between Science and Religion (Bodley Head, 2024) ****½


What a wonderful treat of a book. It describes the discovery of "impossible monsters", the skeletons of dinosaurs and other reptiles in the cliffs of Lyme Regis in Dorset, Southwest England, first by the 12-year old Mary Anning. The ongoing discoveries of other skeletons created a completely different view on ancient animals and on the age of the earth, questioning biblical stories in which these strange animals never even featured. But the book is not about the animals themselves, but how they became the subject of intense debates with the Church and scientists who claimed that the earth was only 6,000 years old. 

Not much later Darwin developed his theory of evolution of the species which added even more fuel to the heated discussions. 

The book gives a wonderful overview of the debates that ensued between religion and science, the opposing views, the discrediting of scientific evidence by religious dogma, but also the whole public debate, including the reports of the actual meetings of the Royal Society of Science in which the topics were debated. 

Michael Taylor was born in 1988 and graduated with a double first in history from the University of Cambridge, where he earned his PhD. He is also the author of "The Interest: How the British Establishment Resisted the Abolition of Slavery". 







Kamel Daoud - Houris (Gallimard, 2024) ****

Algerian author Kamel Daoud has taken a risk by writing about what cannot be written according to the rules of his country of origin, much like Salman Rushdie took risks or Orhan Pamuk took risks (and was jailed for it). 

The story of Aube, the narrator, takes place against the backdrop of the Algerian civil war (1992-2002), when the government and the army took control when it became clear that the islamists risked to win the elections. This 'dirty war' in this 'black decade' possibly resulted in the death of 200,000 people, mostly civilians. 

Aube, 26 years old, is pregnant and tells her story to her unborn child, addressing her as "houris", the word for the virgins in paradise. Gradually her story unravels in between long moments of opinion and reflection on her situation and that of women in Algeria. During the initial uprising, her village was raided by bearded men, who killed every person and animal, cutting their throats and moving on. Five-year old Aube miraculously survived, yet her vocal chords were destroyed and a scar on her throat gave her an internal smile under her face. 

Now, more than twenty years later, this story is still hidden. Daoud brings it back to life in a very personal and intimate way, and it may even be that the story is inspired by a real story: according to the Algerian media, Saâda Arbane, a survivor of a massacre during the black decade, who was treated medically by Kamel Daoud's wife, says she recognized herself in the main character of “Houris”. As soon as he came to power in 1999, Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika passed a law, still in force, prohibiting the sale of books about this period.

"Les gens ici ne te parleront jamais de la guerre qui a tué les miens le 31 décembre 1999. Je passe souvent par ce boulevard, et ces vieillards qui preétendent avoir vaincu la mort frarnçaise se trouvent toujours la à nous épier, nous les nés-plus-tard, a nous scruter comme si nous étions des voleurs. Je détestais reciter cette légende nationale a l'école ; le professeur d'histoire ne comprenait pas pourquoi je décrochais de si mauvaises notes dans cette matière. Il ne voyait pas que je voulais également une voix pour ma guerre. Apres dix ans de tueries, nous n'avons rien pu obtenir comme butin, pas même des corps. Pas même une parole." (p. 116)

She has become independent, with her own hairdresser's shop and beauty salon. After the place is ransacked, she goes back to her native village to find possible relatives. 

Daoud tells the story gradually, in a very lyrical manner, with lots of metaphors. The whole story is built around the opposing forces: Aube has no voice against the amplified voice of the minaret, Aube makes women beautiful while religion wants to hide them from view. She is the victim but is seen as a perpretator, whereas the ones responsible get all the rewards.

"C'est ma vie, ce salon, ma piece de monnaie rare. C'est la que je gagne mon argent et mon indépendance, et le privilège d' avoir les cheveux a l'air et les épaules nues, et de fumer et de boire du vin. Ce n'est pas grand comme commerce, mais ça rapporte de quoi tenir les autres à l'écart. Tu sais, ma perle, l'Etat donne une misère aux victimes survivantes de la guerre civile comme moi et le double aux families des egorgeurs." (p. 56)

When her shop is ransacked, the finds a package, containing a veil and a copy of the Quran, as a token that she needs to submit to the powers of religion. She defies the threat an goes in the street, lighting a cigarette: 

"Puis je l'ai vu, la, le gros paquet, et je ne sais pour quelle rai­son, les histoires de la guerre, la mienne, me sont revenues. A l'époque, lorsqu' on affichait aux portes des mosquées la liste des gens a abattre, on leur envoyait un linceul propre et un savon parfumé. Pour la dernière toilette mortuaire. J'y songeai, tourmentée par cette irruption du rève rouge dans ma vie de tous les jours. Je l'ai ouvert : on m' offrait un voile en mauvais tissu, noir et ample. Et un Coran, vert et impassible, avec des lettres dorées (...) J'allumai une cigarette et, devant les curieux, clans la rue qui sépare le salon de la mosquée, j'ai fumé. En plein jour, je fixais leurs regards durs. Je laissais l'odeur du tabac lentement glisser vers leurs narines indignées. Un moment, j'ai pensé briser les vitres de la mosquée ou crier des insultes, mais avec quelle voix, ma Houri?" (p. 71)

It's not only her own voice that is literally destroyed, no women's voice has the power to be louder than the voice of the minaret.  

"Une grosse voix tonna clans le ciel en suspendant le temps. Elle hurlait, tour a tour suppliante et dédaigneuse, bou­deuse et exigeante, comme le cri d' un délaissé. Aucune femme n'avait cette force vocale ni le droit de l'imiter clans un minaret. C'etait l' appel a la prière de 13 heures. Tout le monde accourut, et la rue se vida." (p. 72)

Aube is the complete opposite of the oppressive political and religious authority of the system. She wants feminine beauty, self-expression and personal choice.  

"Je crois que je suis soulagée d'avoir ete cambriolée. Parce que cela ramène a la surface une guerre muette entre mes houris et les houris de l'imam d'en face. Certains devinent mon identité véritable, la tueuse en moi, la morte. L'imam de la mosquée par exemple. C'est lui, j' en suis presque sure. Quand on s' est croisés pour la première fois clans la rue, qu'il a vu mon « sourire » et le trou clans mon larynx, il a battu en retraite avant de se ressaisir. Chaque fois que je le rencontre, le rire clans mes yeux vert et or l'incommode et lui arrache ses vêtements, devant tous les fldèles, auprès de son propre Dieu. Mon métier est de rendre belles les femmes, vendre des parfums, lisser des chevelures pour qu'elles soient plus longues que les fleuves du paradis. Le sien c'est parler de jihad, de guerre, de butin, de la France, des lois, du pêché sous toutes ses formes, de paradis et de prophètes." (p.78)

To demonstrate the political value of the book, publisher Gallimard issued a formal statement in protection of the author: “Since the publication of his novel, Kamel Daoud has been the target of violent defamatory campaigns orchestrated by certain media close to a regime whose nature is known to all,” The publishing company was banned from presenting Daoud's works at the Algiers International Book Fair, in October 2024. 

In sum, a courageous and major achievement by Daoud, whose main character, the plot of the novel and the balance between action, reminiscence and reflection are beautifully constructed, as well as the moral dilemma of the mother who's considering to abort her foetus as the best measure to protect her about the world she risks to be born in. 

In my personal opinion, the text could have been better served with less excursions outside of the main plot. The slow progress of the main character back to her roots diminishes the tension needed to keep the reader's attention. 

A real-life horror story. 

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Fernanda Melchor - Hurricane Season (Fitzcarraldo, 2023) ****½

Two years ago, I read "Paradais" by Mexican author Fernanda Melchor and I really liked it. So I was more than happy when the English translation of "Hurricane Season" was published. Again with thanks to publishing company Fitzcarraldo for investing in the translation of great non-English literature. 

Somewhere in a Mexican town, the dead body of the Witch is found in a ditch. The novel gives us the various perspectives of all the main characters in the context of this event, in a wonderful and lyrical kaleidoscope of views and experiences. 

The novel starts with a long 'monologue intérieur' by a kind of non-participating observer, whose long and ranting sentences betray a strong moral judgment and emotional connection to the murdered Witch. Because of its impersonal approach, this introduction may be somewhat off-putting, but then the story opens up gradually, by adding the direct experiences of the characters who orbit around the Witch: Yesenia, her cousion and good-for nothing Luismi, who left the Witch's home the morning her body was found together with his stepfather Munra; his friend Brando, tormented by secret lust; and Lusimi's lover, Norma, a 13-year-old runaway carrying her stepfather’s baby.

Life in the village is one of extreme poverty, alcohol and drug abuse, violence, sexual abuse, theft and total disrespect for other people. It is a life of survival and other people only exist for the characters' personal gratification and utility. The story was actually based on true events, and the intention was to write a non-fiction investigation of the murder, but Melchor soon realised that her presence to dig up the details of the murder could be highly dangerous, thus resorting a more fictitious approach of the event. 

Despite the squalour of life in the village, Melchor manages to create a lot of empathy even for the vilest of the people in her narrative. They are the victims of a situation for which they are not responsible: they are poor, uneducated, ignorant and they often make the wrong decisions, choosing immediate gratification over longer term solutions. Everyone is evil and nobody is. And her writing style is so direct and colloquial that it drives the action forward as if you were part of it all. You can also appreciate the work of the translator to keep language like this one close to its original: 

"Got to keep your wits about you in this world, she pontificated. You-drop your guard for a second and they'll crush you, Clarita, so you better just tell that fuckwit out there to buy you some clothes. Don't you be anyone's fool, that's what men are like: a bunch of lazy spongers who you have to keep rounding up to squeeze any use out of them, and that kid's no different; either you tell the little shit what's what or he'll spend all the money on drugs, and before you know it you're the cunt providing for him, Clarita. I'm telling you because I know the little prick, I know him and his tricks alright... I pushed him out! So don't you go losing your head on me, you hear? You've gotta tell him, you tell him to buy you clothes, give you spending money and take you out in Villa, you've gotta keep men like that on a tight leash, keep them busy to stop them coming out with all their shit. Norma nodded, but she had to raise a hand to her mouth to hide her smile when Chabela stopped talking for a second and the pair of them heard thundering snores coming from the man sleeping in the living room. Fucking Clarita, I see you pissing yourself laughing, you silly bitch, Chabela said, although she was also smiling, baring her big yellow teeth." (p.109)

There is beauty in this. That Melchor's magic. 

Han Kang - The Vegetarian (Granta, 2018) ***


When I take the book in my hands, I have trouble remembering what it was all about. I remember it is about a woman who decides to become vegetarian, but not for the usual moral or taste factors, but as the result of a dream. I remember the story was told by the different perspectives of the husband, the brother-in-law, her sister. I remember it is about sexuality, dreams and madness. Now I remember it's also about rebellion, societal rejection, generational conflict and violence. 

Even if I remember that I liked reading it, and even recommended it to my wife, I have a hard time describing the novel in more detail. Maybe it's my memory, maybe it's because the novel is less memorable than other novels. 

Still, the human pain is the feeling I get from the book, in all its complexity and sadness. 
 

Irene Vallejo - Papyrus (Hodder, 2023) ****½


I love books that give a broad, sweeping overview of everything there is to know about a subject, an encyclopaedic vision through history and the boundaries of our knowledge. This is such a book, and even more interesting, it's a book about books, about writing, about the importance of the physical aspects of human writing: clay tablets, parchment, paper, but even more so about what they achieved in terms of sharing stories, ideas and values. Irene Vallejo is a Spanish classical philologist with degrees from the universities of Zaragoza in Spain and Florence in Italy. 

Her passion is clear from the very start. She writes with incredible erudition, but with equal personal joy and personal experience of her relationship with texts and writing. 

 "After all the agonies of doubt, after exhausting every possible delay and excuse, one hot July afternoon, I face the void of the blank page. I've decided to open with the image of some enigmatic hunters stalking their prey. I identify with them. I appreciate their patience, their stoicism, the time they have taken, their steadiness, the adrena­line of the search. For years I have worked as an academic, consulting sources, keeping records, trying to get to know the historical mate­rial. But when it comes down to it, I'm so amazed by the true and recorded history I discover that it seeps into my dreams and acquires, without my volition, the shape of a story. I'm tempted to step into the skin of those who traveled the roads of an ancient, violent, tumultu­ous Europe in pursuit of books. What if I start by telling the story of their journey? It might work, but how can I keep the skeleton of facts distinct beneath the muscle and blood of imagination?  
The initial idea seems to me as fantastical as the journey in search of King Solomon's mines or the Lost Ark, but historical documents show that in the megalomaniacal minds of the kings of Egypt, it was truly possible. It might have been the last and only time - there, in the third century BC - that the dream of gathering all the books in the world, without exception, in a universal library, could become a reality. Today it seems like the plot of a fascinating, abstract story by Borges - or perhaps his great erotic fantasy." (p. XV)

She starts in ancient times, with the endeavour of Alexander The Great to conquer the known world, to create his own city of Alexandria in Egypt, with the largest collection of written material from all the places in his realm. He opened up the world to create a kind of proto-globalism where all cultures could meet and mingle, if not in person, then at least in their written forms. She draws a fantastic picture of how scrolls were written, how they were traded and collected, how they were catalogued and copied. It's a fascinating journey, one that we are of course by and large aware of, but she adds so many snippets of concrete examples and information that it make for fascinating reading. As in this example of the last Egyptian scribes, "who witnessed the shipwreck of their civilization". In 380 CE, Christianity became the compulsory state religion, and pagan cults were prohibited in the Roman Empire. 

"(In the) Temple of Isis on the island of Philae, to the south of the first cataract of the Nile, (...) a group of priests took refuge, men who were repositories of the secrets of their sophisticated writing system and who had been forbidden from sharing their knowledge. One of them, Esmet-Akhom, engraved on the walls of the temple the last hieroglyphic inscription ever written, which ends with the words "for all time and eternity." Some years later, the emperor Justinian I resorted to military force to close the temple where the priests of Isis were holding out, taking the rebels as prisoners. Egypt buried its old gods, with whom it had lived for thousands of years. And, along with its gods, its objects of worship, and the language itself. In just one generation, everything disappeared. It has taken fourteen centu­ries to rediscover the key to that language. (p.53)

Or in this example on the origin of poetry, which makes sense and appears quite obvious once you think about it: 

"In their effort to endure, denizens of the oral world realized that rhythmic language was easiest to remember, and on the wings of this discovery, poetry was born. During recitation, the melody helps the speaker repeat each line without alteration, since it is when the music is broken that the sequence falters. All of us were made to learn poems in school. Years later, after forgetting so many other things, we find we can still remember these poems with extraordi­nary clarity" (p. 81)

I also liked this example to please and annoy my friends in medical practice: 

"What kind of education did those Greeks receive? They were steeped in culture in all its variety. Unlike us, they weren't remotely interested in specialization. They looked down their noses at knowl­edge of a technical nature. They weren't obsessed with employ­ment; after all, they had slaves to work for them. Those who could avoided anything as degrading as having a trade. Leisure was more refined - in other words, it involved cultivating the mind, fostering friendships, making conversation, and leading a contemplative life. Only medicine, an unquestionable social necessity, demanded its own particular kind of training. As a result, doctors suffered from an overt cultural inferiority complex. All of them, from Hippocrates to Galen, repeated the mantra in their texts that a doctor is also a philosopher. They wished to avoid being confined to their field and tried to show themselves to be cultured, slipping the occasional quote by a key poet into their writings." (p. 179) 

She also gives a reflection on her own academic research, and the book format gives her also the opportunity to write about herself, about her own experiences, sometimes funny, sometimes deeply personal. 

As a PhD student she went to the Oxford Library to do some research, but she is confronted with the obligation to "take the oath": 

"A bald man behind a desk interrogated me with­out making eye contact. I answered all his questions, justified my presence, and showed him the papers he asked for with somewhat intimidating politeness. There was a long silence while he entered my information into his vast database, and then, hands still on his keyboard, in a startling swerve in time, he suddenly stepped into the Middle Ages and informed me pompously that the time had come for me to take the oath. He handed me a small stack of laminated cards that showed, each in a different language, the words I would have to say. I did so. I swore to obey the rules. Not to steal, damage, or deface a single book. Not to set fire to the library or help cause a blaze and watch with diabolical pleasure as the roaring flames engulfed its treasures, reducing them to ash." (p. 44)

 Or this even more personal reflection, which again lifts the book out of the academic space into a more personal environment, the perspective that is obviously excluded from any scientific research and publications: 

"Violence among children and teenagers is protected by a barrier of murky silence. For years I took comfort in not having been the class snitch, the tattletale, the coward. Not to have stooped that low. Misplaced pride and shame made me fol­low the rule that certain stories aren't told. Wanting to be a writer was a belated rebellion against that law. The stories that go untold are exactly the ones you must tell. I decided to become the snitch I was so afraid to be. The roots of writing are often dark. This is my darkness, the darkness that nurtures this book, and perhaps nur­tures everything I write. (p.226)

But of course the main message is the power of literature, of writing, of books in all their forms, how they made ideas accessible to anyone around the world, to start sharing common values and a common culture, or at least to value that they're might be other perspectives to look at the same reality: 

"In a time when the vast majority of Greeks scarcely set foot outside their native village, Herodotus was a tireless traveler. He enlisted on merchant ships, moved in slow caravans, struck up con­versation with many people, and visited a great number of cities in the Persian Empire, to give an account of the war with knowledge of the terrain and a range of perspectives. When he met the enemy in his daily life, he offered a different and more precise vision than any other writer. In the words of Jacques Lacarriere, Herodotus strove to topple his Greek countrymen's prejudices, teaching them that "the line between civilization and barbarism is never a geographic bor­der between countries, but a moral border within every people, and beyond that, within each individual." It's curious to note, so many centuries after Herodotus wrote his work, that the earliest history book begins in a ferociously modern way. There are wars between East and West, kidnappings, mutual accusations, differing versions of the same events, and alternative facts".  (p.162)

It is an ode to knowledge, to intellectual curiosity and debate ...

"In its ambiguous state as a Greek city outside of Greece and the seed of Europe beyond the bounds of Europe, Alexandria came to see itself from the outside. During the Library's greatest era and following in Alexander's wake, the Stoic philosophers were bold enough to teach for the first time that all people belonged to a com­munity without borders and were obliged to accept humanity wher­ever and under whichever circumstances they encountered it. We should remember the Greek capital of the Nile delta as the place where this effervescence was born, where the languages and tradi­tions of others began to matter, and where the world and knowledge were understood to be a shared territory. In these aspirations we find a precursor to the great European dream of universal citizenship. Writing, books, and libraries were the technologies that made this utopia possible". (p.232)

... and of course the incredible value of the freedom of speech: 

"Days before The Satanic Verses appeared in bookstores, during the publicity campaign, an Indian journalist asked Rushdie, off the record, whether he was aware of the row that was coming. The writ­er's response was unequivocal: 'It is a funny view of the world to think that a book can cause riots." 
If we look back at the general history of book destruction, we'll see that in fact, the funny view of the world - the oasis, the strange paradise, the Shangri-La, the forest of Lothlorien - is freedom of expression. Over the centuries, the written word has been stubbornly persecuted, and the times when bookstores receive only peaceful visitors who do not wave flags or wag fingers, break windows or set things on fire, or give themselves over to the primitive zeal for prohibition, are in fact the unusual ones. " (p. 294)

The scientific study of writing and books becomes a personal story as well as a humanistic manifesto. At times it is not easy to follow the logic or the thread of her narrative, because so many pieces of information are provided. It is this wealth that makes the book so entertaining and a pleasure to read. 

Highly recommended!




Tim Winton - Juice (Picador, 2024) ****


Set in a dystopian future, somewhere in Australia, a man and a girl are being held captive by an armed man, and locked up underground in a former mine. The man has to explain, to justify who he is in order to persuade his captor to let them live. The book tells the story of the man, like a modern-day Sheherazade, trying to persuade their captor, story after story to extend the time they have to live, or to be convincing enough to be released. As a consequence, this is a thick book. 

The environment plays a key role as backdrop: the world is scorched, people have to live underground for half the year to avoid the blisters they get from the sun, while cultivating their land and collecting water for the other half of the year to be able to survive. The environment is harsh, and so are the people. They distrust one another, they trade out of necessity, and strangers are always suspect and risk to rob you of all your belongings. 

The narrator gets recruited by The Service, a vague and secret organisation that keeps order and attacks the few oligarchs and corporate dynasties who live in all unimaginable wealth in self-constructed hidden places and palaces. The attacks are a kind of retribution, an act of vengeance for the world they destroyed.

The world is brutal, harsh, violent. Even his relationship with his mother is one of distance and secrecy, despite the fact that they live together. His relationship with his partner is also transactional more than a relationship of love. 

Even if the destruction of our environment is the theme of the book, its reflection on human interaction, on social and psychological consequences are as important. 

You may say that the subject is not very original, that many other books and movies cover the same subject, and that is of course true, but Winton's approach is sufficiently disconcerting, unique and compelling to stand out in this long list of dystopian literature. Winton writes with power, in a style that reflects the experience and the personality of the narrator. Like his almost voiceless captor, you wonder whether or not he is telling the truth, whether all the details he provides are invented or real, whether all his efforts to work for The Service have actually happened or not. 

And maybe that is the most interesting part of the novel. You have to listen and assess what's being said. Like the captor, you know the narrator has an agenda, one that must make him the good guy, so that he can hope to live in the end. 

Up to you to decide whether you keep him alive or not. 

Saturday, December 28, 2024

Haruki Murakami - The City And Its Uncertain Walls (Harvill Secker, 2024) ***½


A new novel by Murakami is always something to look forward too, and I must say the last few ones were a slight deception. His style and tone remain the same: simple, everyday questions that normal people have towards life get tangled up in a space between reality and the supernatural, a kind of magical realism. 

In this novel it is a kind of shadow-world - actually a place where all people have shed their shadow - that is enclosed and timeless. It reminds me of Jim Crace's "Eden", a paradise that is equally enclosed by a high wall and where it is hard to get in or out. Only, the paradise does not really seem to be what it is. 

Murakami still is the master of the subtle changes, the slight transformation of perspectives that try to give us a glimpse of another reality, one that is less corporeal yet equally real, but hard to pin down. The question is whether the change is a real one or a psychological one. 

 "The scene also reminded me of a page from a picture book I'd read as a child. In it was a premonition-that something was about to change. Turn a corner and find something awaiting me there. A feeling I often had as a boy. And that something there would tell me a critical fact, which would force a suitable transformation in me." (p.196)

"I had the vague sense that something around me was gradu­ally changing. It was as if, unaware, I was slowly being led some­where by some sort of power. But was this a recent development, or something that had been going on from quite some time ago? I had no clue. (p. 287)

It is also symbolic that the main character becomes a librarian, with his alter ego working as a dream reader in the library of dreams in the enclosed space in the other world. There is no real evil in the novel, just different realities with unclear and abstract passages between them, leading to mystery and existential surprise, a detective story of the possible. 

Yet the mystery remains. The story develops and things become increasingly clear - as one would expect, and despite the many strange things happening, it becomes plausible under Murakami's pen, and never deteriorates into blunt fantasy story-telling. Not suprisingly, the stories of Gabriel Garcia Marquez come to mind, and literally mentioned here.  

""In his stories the real and the unreal, the living and the dead, are all mixed together in one," she said. "Like that's an entirely ordinary, everyday thing.
"People often call that magical realism," I said. 
"True. But I think that although that way of telling stories might fit the critical criteria of magical realism, for Garcia Marquez him­self it's just ordinary realism. In the world he inhabits the real and the unreal coexist and he just describes those scenes the way he sees them.
I sat down on the stool beside her and said, "So you' re saying that in the world he inhabits, the real and the unreal are equiva­lent and that Garcia Marquez is simply recording that.
'Yes, I think that might be the case. And that's what I like about his novels." (p. 392)

In the epilogue the author explains how the story for this book had been germinating for decades, until finally the time was ripe to actually write it. Even if it is a nice book, it does not really add anything new to Murakami's output, apart from being an entertaining read. And the older he gets, the more words he seem to need to come to the essence of his story. At times I think that he writes too naturally and too fluently which creates a lot of sentences that go to the detriment of the tension and forward drive that you expect from a mystery novel. Or maybe I am getting to old, which is also a possible perspective of course. 


Tuesday, October 29, 2024

Abbott Kahler - Eden Undone (Harper Collins, 2024) **½


When buying books on Amazon, they often give "recommendations based on your past choices", and this book popped up, with the amazing subtitle "A True Story of Sex, Murder and Utopia at the Dawn of World War II", which appealed to my boyish nature. 

I will refrain from doing semantic exercises on the description "A True Story" as initiated by the movie Fargo. What happened then is not a story. It is true. A German physician and his patient move to Floreana in 1930, one of the Galápagos Islands with the sole intent of creating their own paradise, their own eden, far from the madness and obligations of society. Dr. Friedrich Ritter also has the high aspirations to write his own philosophical treatise about how to live in this world. He describes their new paradise in a series of newspaper articles, which of course leads to other people sharing his idea. They are followed by another German couple who are looking for a place where their ill and almost blind son, still a boy, can hope to benefit from a good environment. Next comes an Austrian-French sex-obsessed Baroness with two 'male slaves' and an Ecuadorian translator. The baroness is a true narcissist, self-obsessed, manipulative, dictatorial, charming if need be, seductive and commanding. 

Because the media attention they create, they also generate the interest of the very rich Americans, who come to visit with their cruise ships to see for themselves how these Europeans have eked out a living in the harsh environment of the Galapagos. 

Needless to say that this Eden soon becomes a nightmare for all involved, with the truth becoming a commodity as rare as luxury goods. Human nature comes to the fore even among the most principled people, leading to theft, hypocrisy, gossip, shifting alliances, hate, death and murder. 

Kahler brings it like a documentary, extensively using excerpts from letters and articles, and literally including all events that took place, which gives possibly a very distorted view of the actual boring life these people must have had on the island, with the exception of the conflicts that were documented. The book has also no literary ambition to bring more than just a report. It's a missed opportunity with this kind of material to work from. 

It's a fascinating microcosm of humanity, isolated and reduced to a handful of people. It could have been staged for a play, to reduce the madness of our kind on one tiny location, with high hopes and lofty aspirations leading to a predictable catastrophy within a very short time span. It's a mirror to all of us, and if a fiction author had developed a plot such as this one, the reader would say it's possibly too programmatic, too artificial to be credible. 

In this sense it really is a story. But then a true one. 

Monday, October 28, 2024

Kevin J. Mitchell - Free Agents - How Evolution Gave Us Free Will (Princeton University Press, 2023) *****


Earlier this year I read Robert Sapolsky's "Determined - Life Without Free Will" in which he argues that our idea of free will is only an illusion, and that any action our body takes is actually the result of hundreds of unconscious forces that work in it. Much earlier, I also read Sam Harris's "Free Will" which makes a very similar claim, although less substantiated and more philosophical. 

As a counter-argument I came across this delightful book by geneticist and neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell, professor at Trinity College in Dublin, Ireland, and author of the blog "Wiring The Brain". 

In contrast to his blog, he does not take Sapolsky head-on in this book, but it's clear that some of the arguments come from refutations of some of Sapolsky's claims. Both books are well-documented, both are written by experts in their fields, and both come to different conclusions. Both agree that there is no 'immaterial I" that takes decisions, or that there is no mind-body duality. Both agree that many of our decisions are pre-determined by patterns of culture, genes, education, etc. They disagree whether this body can make any deliberate choice now, at this very moment, by weighing the pros and cons of certain actions. Sapolsky will say the choice is automatic. Mitchell will say that our neurons balance the options and our brain eventually makes a choice. That our body has "agency". 

Interestingly enough, the recent debate on this topic, and largely the spark that lit the fire for the books of Sapolsky, Harris and Mitchell goes back to an experiment conducted by neuroscientist Benjamin Libet in 1983. Mitchell also comes with a different interpretation on the methodology and the result of the data. 

I share a whole lot of text below, as examples of parts of his arguments. I can only recommend that you read the whole book. 

This question of morality is a topic that Sapolsky ends his book with. And the question is essential. Without free will, how can we make moral decisions? 

"Another barrier to a clear explication of the arguments around whether free will exists is that they are often approached from the direc­tion of their consequences for our positions on moral responsibility. If people are not really in control of their actions - if we are nothing more than physical automata, mounting a wonderfully sophisticated but ul­timately empty simulacrum of free will - then how can we be worthy of praise or blame? How can we defend judgment or punishment? The stakes here could not be higher. The idea of moral responsibility is the foundation not only of our legal systems but also of all our social interactions. We are constantly thinking about what we should or shouldn't do in any given circumstance and probably spend even more time thinking about what other people should or shouldn't do ( or should or shouldn't have done). But tying the discussion of free will to the issue of moral responsibility muddies the waters. Questions of moral responsibility are crucially important, of course, but they are confounded by all kinds of additional issues: the nature and origins of our moral sensibilities, the evolution of moral norms, the legal philosophies underpinning our justice systems, and the complex and innumerable pragmatic decisions that societies and individuals have to make to keep our collective existence stable. Ask­ing what kind of free will we want that will let us maintain our positions on moral responsibility can become almost a theological exercise in motivated reasoning" (p.17)

Mitchell goes very deep into the origin of our species and explains how even in the most basic forms of life, choices are made, obviously not conscious choice, but choices all the same. Even the very first cells, who function based on chemical reactions, start having options on how to proceed. The concept of 'information' as the basis for agency is essential to his thesis. 

"Although their behaviors appear simple from the outside, these single-celled creatures are thus far from being passive stimulus-response machines. Their response to a given signal depends on what other signals are around and on the cell's internal state at the time. These organisms infer what is out in the world, where it is, and how it is changing. They process this information in the context of their own internal state and recent experience, and they actively make holistic decisions to adapt their internal dynamics and select appropriate actions. This represents a wholly different type of causation from anything seen before in the universe. The behavior of the organism is not purely driven or determined by the playing out of physical forces acting on it or in it. Clearly, a physical mechanism underpins the behavior, which explains how the system works. But thinking of what it is doing-and why it is doing it-in terms of the resolution of instantaneous physical forces is simply the wrong framing. The causation is not physical in that sense-it is informational." (p.62)

or a little further ...

"These simple organisms are not aware of those reasons. But it is still correct to say that the organism is doing something because it increases its chances of persistence. Or, at a finer level, that it is moving in a certain direction to get food or to escape a predator. It's right to think of various components and subsystems as having functions. And it's right to say the organism is acting on the basis of inferences about what is out in the world, rather than simply being triggered by external stimuli. The mecha­nisms are simply the means by which those goals are accomplished. Even these humble unicellular creatures thus have real autonomy and agency, as organized dynamic patterns of activity, causally insulated from their environment, and configured to maintain themselves through time. It is not merely that they hold themselves apart from the world outside: they act in the world and on the world in a goal-directed manner. They are causal agents in their own right. As evolution proceeds, the degree of autonomy increases-at least along some lineages, like the ones leading to humans. The tight coupling of perception and action is loosened. With the advent of multicellularity and especially the invention of nervous systems, additional layers of processing emerge. Organisms evolve the means to represent sensory in­formation internally without directly acting on it. More sophisticated control systems emerge for guiding action over longer timeframes. Organ­isms develop internal systems of evaluation that free them from the brutal, life-or-death judgment of natural selection. Crucially, all these systems are informational. Meaning becomes the currency of cognition." (p. 67)

The complexity of our bodies implies that our brains receive information from various sources inside and outside the body, information that needs to be integrated, balanced and decided upon based on neural hierarchies in the brain.  

"But the coupling between perception and action is at least loosened a bit. There are now some intermediate stages of processing-carried out by the middle layers of interneurons-during which multiple signals are integrated to allow the animal to respond to the situation as a whole, as opposed to independent stimuli. Specific interneurons collect signals from multiple sensory neurons responding to diverse aversive stim­uli, while other interneurons sum the activity of a different set of sen­sory neurons responsive to diverse attractive stimuli. The relative activ­ity of these interneurons is then itself integrated at another stage to determine whether the sum of attraction outweighs the sum of aversion. All of this is dependent on the context: responses to those integrated external sensory signals differ depending on the current internal state of the animal."(p.91)

 At a further stage, information becomes meaning. 

"When configured in this way, perceptual systems are not just pro­cessing information-they are extracting meaning. The patterns of neu­ral activity across different areas in the visual hierarchy represent the system's best guesses of what is out in the world, focused on what is most relevant and important for the survival of the organism. Those guesses are not merely passively computed through successive levels of information processing. The organism is actively, subjectively interpret­ing this information, bringing its prior experience and expectations to bear. (p.118)

In this sense, we are neither a machine nor is there a ghost in the machine. We are an organism that decides. 

"In a holistic sense, the organism's neural circuits are not deciding­: the organism is deciding. It's not a machine computing inputs to produce outputs. It's an integrated self deciding what to do, based on its own reasons. Those reasons are derived from the meaning of all the various kinds of information that the organism has at hand, which is grounded in its past experience and used to imagine possible futures. The process relies on physical mechanisms but it's not correct to think it can be reduced to those mechanisms. What the system is doing should not be identified with how the system is doing it. Those mechanisms collectively comprise a self, and it's the self that decides. If we break them apart, even conceptu­ally, we lose sight of the thing we' re trying to explain. 

However, although we can reject a reductionist, purely mechanistic approach, that should not send us running in the other direction toward a nebulous, mysteriously nonphysical mind that is "in charge": the ghost in the machine. Our minds are not an extra layer sitting above our physi­cal brains, somehow directing the flow of electrical activity. The activity distributed across all those neural circuits produces or entails our mental experience ( and similarly for whatever kinds of mental experience other animals have). The meaning of those patterns for the organism has causal power based on how the system is physically configured. We can thus build a holistic physical conception of agency without either re­ducing it or mystifying it." (p. 144)

"This skepticism seems partly due to the enduring intellectual legacy of French philosopher and mathematician Rene Descartes, which has shaped the Western scientific tradition. One of Descartes's most famous ideas is that the world is made of two very different types of substance: the physical and the mental. This dualist position gets around having to explain how physical stuff can produce immaterial things like thoughts by simply positing that thoughts occupy a kind of parallel realm of the mental. The problem with this idea-pointed out by some of Descartes's contemporaries, such as the astute and wonderfully titled Elizabeth, Prin­cess of Bohemia - is that it does not explain how the physical and the mental realms can interact. They clearly seem to, because thinking about doing something can indeed lead to us doing it - physically moving our bodies and things in the world - but how? Descartes did not have a good answer to this question (though he did propose a route of communication through the pineal gland, for no particularly good reason). 

You would think we would have moved on by now, after four hun­dred years, but it seems we still get hung up on a version of the same question: How could having a conscious thought move physical stuff around? Doesn't that somehow violate the laws of physics? It seems to require a mysterious form of top-down causation in which the mental pushes the physical around. But this apparent mystery only arises if we think of the mental as some realm of free-floating thoughts and ideas. It's not a question of whether immaterial thoughts can push around physi­cal stuff. Thoughts are not immaterial: they are physically instantiated in patterns of neural activity in various parts of the brain, which can naturally have effects on how activity evolves in other regions. There's no need to posit a "ghost in the machine"-you're not haunting your own brain. The "ghost" is the machine at work." (p. 268)

 By accepting our free will as an evolutionary outcome that gives us powers no other animal has ever had, we also need a heightened sense of responsibility, anticipation and morality. 

"By being able to think at this level, we turn isolated elements of knowledge into a more general understanding of how the world works, something that artificial intelligence still struggles to do. And we can deploy that understanding in directing our own behavior, even in osten­sibly novel situations. We can combine these nested hierarchies of con­cepts and maps of causal relations and system dynamics in new, creative ways within this abstract cognitive space and thereby engage in open­ended, model-based reasoning. We can imagine things. In effect, we can mentally simulate a model of the world and "run" it in fast forward, predicting and evaluating outcomes of various actions over short and long timeframes. 

Our ability to model the world in this way gives us unprecedented control over our environments. When faced with some problem, we have the ability to see the bigger picture by taking into account a wider context and a longer time horizon. This means we can avoid getting stuck in local optima - the quickest, easiest solution to a local problem­and instead optimize for global parameters. We can think strategically, not just tactically." (p. 254)

Without a doubt Mitchell's book is more than welcome and was a great relief to have his substantiated arguments for free will. Even when Sapolsky argues that the absence of free will may be morally liberating, his concept still felt suffocating and utterly reductionist. Mitchell's arguments are scientifically sound and they offer us a much stronger and open foundation to start working on, both as an individual and as a society. 

I have the intense pleasure of seeing my four grandsons - between one month and four years old - learn about the world and their immediate environment. When I see them discover their feet (the youngest) or make choices when playing, or interacting with each other, the only thing I see are four distinct characters, exploring, choosing, reasoning, fantasising, enjoying themselves and the freedom they have to do this. They are not little machines who are fully determined by culture or genes. They are four individuals enjoying life (well ... OK, sometimes not). Their life is in front of them. They will make billions of choices in the future. That is what life offers them, what it offers us. 

Anybody interested in evolution, cognitive science, society and ethics should read this book. But don't trust me ... I am fully confident that you can do this based on your own free will. 

Jean-Baptiste Andrea - Veiller Sur Elle (L'Iconoclaste, 2023) ***½


Recommended by my wife, so it must be good. Winner of the Prix Goncourt, book of the year by Fnac and the favourite novel of the readers of Elle. 

This is the story of Mimo and Viola, born in 1904, two people who should never have met when they were thirteen. He is born into poverty, leaving his widowed mother in France, returning to the Italy of his ancestors to be brought up in the workshop of an alcoholic sculptor uncle. She lives in the most powerful family in Liguria. Two polar opposites trapped in their situation, she in her woman's body dreaming to have the same possibilities as men to fulfill her dreams; he suffering from dwarfism while he intends to master marble blocks to become a sculptor. Yet both are smart and sensitive and exceptional in their own way. And they connect. 

The novel opens in 1986. Mimo, on the threshold of death in a Piedmontese abbey where he has lived in seclusion for some forty years without taking the vows, recalls the thread of his life, his unique relationship with Viola and the story of his masterpiece: a mysterious statue that so disturbing to anyone who saw it that the Vatican decided to keep it out of sight.

Andrea is an incredible story-teller, epic and poetic at the same time, driving the action forward, adding characters, situations, cities ... adding layers that are all representing hurdles in the way for the one romantic ideal of the perfect sculpture and the perfect love. 

Of course you want these two special people to succeed, the identification by the reader with the fate of the protagonists is great even if there are obviously no common elements with my own situation. 

Andrea adds another layer of magic which he keeps hidden as much as possible but that is frequently hinted so that you know that there is more to it than meets the eye. This suspense is also the result of his excellent compositional work. The dying Mimo who reflects back on his life, surrounded by the monks who try to assist him, while the events of his youth unfold in parallel chapters. 

The book is 580 pages long, but I read it in a few days while on holiday. It's not complicated. It's easy to read. The story is captivating and moving. His style is direct and functional. 

A book to enjoy if you like great story-telling. 


Sunday, October 27, 2024

Horacio Castellanos Moya - Selflessness (New Directions, 2008) **½


To be honest, when I read the plot - where? - I was immediately interested in reading this novel: "A boozing, sex-obsessed writer finds himself employed by the Catholic Church (an institution he loathes) to proofread a 1,100 page report on the army’s massacre and torture of thousands of indigenous villagers a decade earlier, including testimonies of the survivors. The writer’s job is to tidy it up: he rants “that was what my work was all about, cleaning up and giving a manicure to the Catholic hands that were piously getting ready to squeeze the balls of the military tiger.”

The narrator gets vague instructions and is even wondering whether his boss - the Church - has any idea about the content and potential impact of the report. While reading, he is amazed by the poetic responses by the indigenous villagers when tortured and killed. Some examples
  • The houses they were sad because no people were inside them.
  • For me the sorrow is not to bury him myself.
  • They grabbed Diego Nap López and the grabbed a knife each officer giving him a stab or cutting off a small slice
  • While the cadavers they were burning, everyone clapped and they began to eat
The poetic phrasing by the indigenous people is a way to create distance, or to make sense of it, to objectivise the horror of their experiences. 

The subject is as hard as it can get, yet the personal life of the narrator and his petty sex obsession turn the novel into a puerile story, with long endless sentences that describe in multiple ways what he is doing or experiencing, as a kind of László Krasznahorkai copy-cat. It becomes tedious in the end, including the sexual acrobatics. The harsh reality of the indigenous villagers seems to be a pretext rather than the essence. The author wants to impress instead of to express. And that is rarely good. 

Saturday, October 26, 2024

Sarah Bakewell - Humanly Possible (Penguin, 2023) *****


When reading the short description of the book's content, I was hesitant. I am already convinced of the value of its contents. Second, I have read already so much on the subject that I wondered whether it would convey anything new. The reality of reading proved me wrong. Even if you consider yourself a 'humanist', and maybe because you are, you should read this book. It is extremely well-documented and extremely well-written. Bakewell starts the book with the 'credo' of humanism, as penned by Robert G. Ingersoll in the 19th Century: 

Happiness is the only good. 
The time to be happy is now. 
The place to be happy is here. 
The way to be happy is to make others so. 

Even if I was well aware or vaguely aware of the content of the thinkers and authors that she describes in this book, the real novelty is how these thoughts were received in society and how they evolved to become part of broader political and philosophical thinking. 

Her journey starts in the early 14th Century with the writings of Petrarch and Boccacio ("When his father contemplated training him for the church as 'a good way to get rich' it turned out he had no liking or aptitude for that either"). Both authors raided libraries to re-discover the ancient Latin authors, revived them, wrote about them. Bakewell mentioned that Bocaccio at one stage considered abandoning his literary endeavours because "a monk, Pietro Petroni of Sienna, warned him in 1632 that he would imminently die if he did not get rid of all the non-Christian books in his library and stop writing books himself. This had been revealed to him in a vision". Luckily, Petrarch used smarter arguments to convince him of the opposite: 'ignorance is not the path to virtue". He advocated for knowledge and learning, of a healthy abundance in words and ideas. 

We take it for granted today that we have immediate access to the works of Cicero, Epicurus, Terentius and Democritus, but that is of course not the case. Very few scholars even spoke Greek, so they had no way of understanding or valuing whatever Greek texts still existed in hidden libraries across Italy or elsewhere. The geneaology goes further: Poggio rediscovered Lucretius' "On The Nature of Things". Printing was invented and became a great power to share old and new ideas about broader groups of people. Lorenzo Valla is the next in line. 

"His name was Lorenzo Valla, and his 1440 treatise On the Donation of Constantine is one of the great humanist achievements. It combines a precise scholarly assault with the high rhetorical techniques learned from the ancients, served up with a sauce of hot chutzpah. All these assets were necessary to Valla, because he was daring to attack one of the church's central modern claims: its justification for having complete power over all of western Europe. It could be a short step from that to questioning its other claims to authority, too, including the authority it held over peo­ple's minds. Valla seems to have been a man who had no fear and could never be persuaded to keep quiet. He traveled all over Italy, working for a series of patrons and supporters-at this point he was living in Naples-but he made enemies everywhere as well. The poet Maffeo Vegio had already warned him to seek advice before writing things that would hurt people's feelings, and generally to restrain his "intellectual violence." (p.87)

It takes courage to have intellectual curiosity, to be open to ideas that challenge beliefs and established authority: "Dispute and contradiction, not veneration and obedience, are the essence of intellectual life. And crucially, Valla did not merely tell people they were wrong, he gave the reasons why they were wrong" (p.93). 

On Vesalius: 

"He blamed both himself and other anatomists for having been too Galen-reliant: "I shall say noth­ing more about these others; instead I shall marvel more at my own stu­pidity and blind faith in the writings of Galen and other anatomists." He ends the section by urging students to rely on their own careful examina­tions, taking no one's word for anything, not even his own. This was a good warning, since Vesalius himself did not get every­thing right. One error was that he failed to identify the clitoris cor­rectly, misdescribing it as part of the labia. It took another Padua anatomist, Realdo Colombo, to correct him. Realdo even knew what it was for, which implies that he had noticed it in contexts other than the dissection table. He named it ''amor Veneris, vel dulcedo" ("love of Venus, or thing of pleasure"), gave details of its role in women's sexual experiences, and remarked, "It cannot be said how astonished I am that so many famous anatomists had not even an inkling of such a lovely thing, perfected with such art for the sake of such utility." (p. 130)

On education and Erasmus schooling in a monastery: 

Instead, the effect on Erasmus was to implant in him a lifelong aver­sion to cruelty or intimidation of any kind. He would have agreed with a remark made centuries later by E. M. Forster in describing the miseries of his own public-school education: "The worst trick it ever played me was to pretend that it was the world in miniature. For it hindered me from discovering how lovely and delightful and kind the world can be, and how much of it is intelligible." That was another reason Erasmus took a poor view of his schooling: the unworldliness and irrelevance to real life of the monks' attitudes. It was a common humanist complaint to say that such institutions were old-fashioned, pedantic, and out of touch with reality. For Erasmus, as for Agricola, and later for Forster, a young mind needs to be liberated from meaningless, useless systems of knowledge as taught by unenlight­ened masters of an outmoded stamp who themselves have no idea how to live." (p. 142) 

Other luminaries who are part of the genealogy: Pico della Mirandola, Leon Battista Alberti, Andreas Vesalius, Desiderius Erasmus, Michel de Montaigne, Voltaire, Diderot, Pierre Bayle, Thomas Paine, David Hume, Mary Wollstonecraft, Harriet Taylor, Jeremy Bentham, Frederick Douglas ("There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven, that does not know that slavery is wrong for him"), Oscar Wilde, John Stuart Mill, Wilhelm von Humboldt ("The State that enforces a particular belief is denying people the right to be fully human"), Matthew Arnold. Charles Darwin, Thomas Huxley, Ernest Renan, Auguste Comte, Bertrand Russell, ...

Bakewell is also very conscious of the value of humanism to all humans and not only to the male part of it. 

"Pericles (told) Athenian free men in 430 BCE that they are excel­lent because they are harmonious, responsible, and politically active - only to add that this does not apply to women, whose only virtue is never to be mentioned by anyone at all. That continued to be the norm for millennia: instead of the mainstream of human excellence, women were offered a rivulet of negative side virtues: modesty, silence, placidity, innocence, chastity. Each of these is characterized by the absence of some positive quality (confidence, eloquence, active responsibility, experience, and - well, I'll leave it to you to decide what the virtuous opposite of chastity is, but whatever we call it, it is surely more fun)." (p.203) 

There

"Connections, communications, moral and intellectual links of all kinds, as well as the recognition of difference and the questioning of ar­bitrary rules: these all go to form the web of humanity. They enable each of us to live a fulfilling life on Earth, in whichever cultural context we are at home, and also to try to understand each other the best we can. They are more likely to encourage an ethics of worldly flourishing, in contrast with belief systems that picture each frustrated soul waiting hopefully for a correction of fortunes in the afterlife. The modern humanist will always prefer to say, with Robert G. Ingersoll, that the place to be happy is here, in this world, and the way to be happy is to try to make others so.  The old Golden Rule, associated with several religions as well as with secular morality, has much to offer here: "Do as you would be done by." Or, in the more modest, reversed form that is more hospitable to diver­sity: Don't do something to others if you wouldn't like it yourself. It is not perfect, but a good rule of the humanist thumb is to say that, if you don't like being told to stay silent and invisible, or being enslaved and abused, or being unable to get into buildings because no one thought to install a ramp, or being considered less than human, then the chances are that other people are not fond of it, either. Or, as Kongzi said: "The Master's way consists of doing one's best to fulfill one's humanity and treating others with an awareness that they, too, are alive with humanity." (p 218, 219)

This book is a great overview of humanist thought: inquisitive, inclusive, caring, ethical, motivated by a happiness for all, in diversity of thought and the right of each individual to personal freedom and fullfilment and happiness. For me this overview is the absolute hope and despair of humanity. Hope because it offers a clear perspective and a way of thinking, despair because over the centuries of expanded thinking on the subject, we have not moved significantly further at a global level. Our technology has advanced exponentially over the last two centuries, mainstreaming it across the globe, yet humanist thinking has despite its obvious value and benefits barely created strong understanding and use in most of the world. 

Bakewell is an excellent guide, erudite and entertaining and truly committed. 

Not to be missed. 

Friday, October 25, 2024

Bart D. Ehrman - Armageddon - What the Bible Really Says About the End (Simon & Schuster, 2024) ****


Few things are more intriguing than religious beliefs. Texts written in ancient cultures have received over the years a status of divine truth, regardless of their factual accuracy, their physical possibilities, their internal contradictions and their lack of morals. Bart Ehrman studied religion when still a strong evangelical believer. His knowledge of the ancient languages and ancient history helped him understand the reality behind the texts. I can recommend many of his thirty books, half of which I have read. In the New Testament, the latest book, called "Revelation", written by a certain John of Patmos, describes Armageddon, the End Time, when Jesus returns and the Good will be separated from the Evil. This Book stands in stark contrast to the other books in the New Testament, in that it shows a return of the god of the Old Testament: it's no longer a loving and caring god, but a god full of wrath, vindictive, violent, powerful. A god who demands full submission and slavelike obedience. 

The imagery is strong violent, hallucinatory, excessive, with symbols and signs that are sometimes hard to interpret for modern day readers, but even in the earliest centuries scholars expressed their lack of understanding and there was a lot of discussion whether or not to include it in the New Testament. Eventually it was, but people like Martin Luther put them in the annex to his translation of the book. 

The most amazing thing is that this text is still a very lively prospect among evangelical christians, especially in the United States, and a strong part of Donald Trump's followers. They believe that Jesus will only come back to earth for the end times, when the jews reconquer the Mount of the Rock, and restore the original Temple that was destroyed in 40 CE. That explains the strong support for Israel and the sometimes inexplicable disregard for the human suffering of the Palestines. 

That people actually believe this, and actually build their life around this possibility is astonishing: 

"We are talking about a wide-ranging cultural phenomenon. One fairly recent poll indicates that 79 percent of Christians in America believe Jesus will be returning to earth at some point. Another poll taken in 2010 shows that 47 percent of the Christians in the country believe Jesus will return by 2050 (27 percent definitely and 20 percent probably)." (p. 15)

Many Christian sects have even determined with precision when exactly this would happen. Ehrman gives a great overview of all the wrong calculations by recent Christian sects, but being demonstrably wrong did not deter them from believing. The downside is that because a precise date for the end time was presented, the cult's followers often sold their farms, or did not harvest, or even gave all their belongings away, in the hope of buying their ticket to heaven. 

"Instead of admitting they were wrong, however, the group buoys itself by explaining to one another what really happened, jus­tifying themselves in face of the disconfirmation by pointing out a slight error in their calculations or claiming the event was inten­tionally delayed and then resetting the date. But most interesting, the group further resolves the dissonance by becoming more evan­gelistic, going out to win more converts to their views. Why would a mistake make someone missionary? The theory behind cognitive dissonance is that if more people acknowledge you are right, it eases the psychological trauma of knowing that you are probably wrong. So you set out to win over other devotees. Thus, the Millerites and their resetting of dates. Each time the expectation is disconfirmed, the group gets larger and more fervent, until the Final Disappointment takes effect. But even then, the idea does not necessarily go away, nor do the groups themselves. Various American religious groups emerged from the Millerites' Great Disappointment-"at least 33," accord­ing to sociologists of religion Rodney Stark and William Sims Bain­bridge. Hope springs eternal, and these groups thrive among us today, holding strong eschatological views about the coming end­normally, now, without setting dates. The two break-off groups most familiar to modern readers are the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Seventh-day Adventists" (82-83)

Another major distinction between this Book and the Gospels, is the future vision of life after the final judgment. The followers of the Lamb or the Lord, will live in absolute power and absolute opulence: all infidels will be violently tortured and destroyed and the followers will live in a city of gold with all the riches and wealth one can imagine. Whereas the Gospels advocate for humility, service, caring, love, even for people of other groups, the Revelation is a brutal tale of reconquering power from Rome, and doing with other peoples exactly what was being done to them in the first place. After the End Times, the oppressed will be the oppressors, the poor will be massively wealthy. Instead of inspiring with new insights, spirituality and brotherhood, the Book of Revelation continues the ancient power narrative, with only a shift in power. 

"We have already seen that the book is massively violent. (...) I want to stress that the violence of the book is not an end in itself but a means to an end. The ultimate goal is revenge. But more than that, it is limitless possessions and power. In the end, the right people will get what the wrong people have now. As New Testament scholar Christopher Frilingos has so succinctly expressed, the book is all about who will dominate the world: ''A frankly imperialist nar­rative, Revelation predicts the end of the Roman Empire and the beginning of a Christian one." Revelation does not adopt a new Christian attitude toward wealth and domination. It instead affirms the attitude promoted by Roman culture, the same view held by most people who choose not to follow the teachings of Jesus: wealth and domination can be ultimate goods." (172) 

This text that at first reading appears to have been written by a madman, and that for sure no publisher would even think of publishing today if anyone came with this manuscript, is still today a text that determines the thinking of millions of gullible people, even to the extent that it plays a role in the power politics of the Middle-East. 


 

Fons Van Dyck - De Toekomst Is Terug (Pelckmans, 2024) ***½


Vele zaken zijn cyclisch, en de tijden evolueren. Rond 2010 leidde ik bij Janssen de "branding" oefening om het merk Janssen wereldwijd in de markt te zetten nadat alle farmabedrijven van de groep Johnson & Johnson onder één merk geïntegreerd werden. Samen met bedrijfsmerkenspecialist Fons Van Dyck en zijn teams organiseerden we workshops in Europa en de VS met alle betrokkenen om het merk precies te kunnen positioneren, gevolgd door teksten, video's en ander communicatiemateriaal om het merk tot leven te brengen. Dit jaar werd het merk "Janssen" ten grave gedragen en de organisatie herdoopt in Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, een hele mondvol, en een terugkeer naar het merk van het moederbedrijf. 

Van Dyck is één van die weinige professionals die naast hun werk ook intellectueel maatschappelijk betrokken zijn, met zijn wekelijkse columns in de krant, maar ook als publicist en spreker. Dit is al zijn vijfde boek, een supergoed gestoffeerd werk over een onderwerp dat een kwarteeuw in zijn hoofd heeft zitten spelen. Een merk bestaat uit zeer diepe emotionele associaties die aansluiten bij de doelstellingen van het bedrijf als bij de verwachtingen van de klant. Ook hier wordt diep onder de oppervlakte gegraven om de essentie te vatten. 

Zeer vergelijkbaar is zijn uitgangspunt hier dat er vier krachten onze samenleving bepalen, als grote drijfveren die als optelsom van alle individuen ook de brede golven aangeven van de trends die we zien en mee helpen tot stand komen, en die hij gemakshalve alle vier met "Ver-" doet starten. 


Die krachten zijn Verkennen (om grenzen te verleggen), Verbinden (in harmonie met onze omgeving), Veroveren (van macht, status en rijkdom), Verdedigen (wanneer we ons bedreigd voelen). Ze bepalen de grote tendenzen in onze samenleving als een golfbeweging van het sentiment van de massa. "Verkennen" en "Verbinden" klinken positief, en "Veroveren" en "Verdedigen" negatief, maar dat is niet noodzakelijk: ze kunnen van lading veranderen. 

Naast deze grote krachten, die Van Dyck toelicht met voorbeelden uit het bedrijfsleven, de mode, de wielrennerij en uiteraard de politiek en vele andere sectoren, verwijst hij naar zijn mentor Helmut Gaus, professor aan de Universiteit van Gent over diens theorie van de grote trends in de samenleving, een cyclus die varieert tussen de veertig en zestig jaar. En gemakshalve vergelijkt hij die met onze vier seizoenen. 

De voorlaatste 'zomer' situeerde zich in 1971, het ongebreideld toekomstoptimisme als een gevolg van de toegenomen welvaart, technologische vernieuwing, en democratie. 

Deze cycli met uiteraard lente en herfst tussenin variëren om de veertig tot zestig jaar. Onze vorige winter was eind jaren '80, met veel werkloosheid, Tsjernobyl, AIDS, terreur (Bende van Nijvel, CCC), enz. Volgens de auteur was de vorige zomer in 2021. Mij verbaast dit. De angst - ook door Covid - met alle anti-vaxers, het extreem-rechts gedachtengoed dat al opgang maakte, was toen al een paar jaar bezig. Maar goed, misschien moet je abstractie maken van een aantal zaken om de grote tendenzen te kunnen vastleggen. 

Voor alle duidelijkheid: deze cycli zijn een reflectie van een mentale dominantie in de samenleving, zoals bijvoorbeeld voortuigangoptimisme versus angst voor de toekomst, vertrouwen in elkaar versus argwaan, en heeft slechts onrechtstreeks te maken met effectieve gebeurtenissen in de samenleving. 

Vandaag gaan we een mentale winter in. Van Dyck geeft de resultaten van een opiniepeiling die hij liet uitvoeren bij onze Vlaamse medeburgers. Zo denkt bijvoorbeeld 91% van de mensen dat de angst van mensen voor de toekomst zal toenemen, of vindt één op de drie Vlamingen dat het onverantwoord is om vandaag kinderen op de wereld te zetten. Deze mentale winter is ook te meten aan het stemgedrag van de bevolking, waarbij Verdedigen en Veroveren vandaag sterker staan dan Verbinden en Verkennen. De mensen plooien op zichzelf terug, stemmen extremistisch en ze denken dat sterke leiders met veel macht wenselijk zijn. 

Ik heb mijn twijfels bij de geïdentificeerde cycli als een soort fatalistische onvermijdbaarheid. Ze zijn ook zeer Westers en zelfs relatief lokaal. Maar ook al ben ik het niet met alles eens wat in Fons Van Dycks boek staat, zijn goed gedocumenteerde visie is meer dan het lezen waard, en zoals elke grote intellectuele inspanningen nodigt dit ook uit tot meer diepgaande reflectie over het lot van ons als mensen. Van Dyck blijft echter optimistisch en eindigt zijn boek met een aantal handvatten om de toekomst aan te pakken. 

Meer dan het lezen waard.